« February 2010 | Main | April 2010 »

March 31, 2010

Willy called it the Shinning

On occasion, movies outshine the books they were made from.  One of these cases is The Shining.  I had seen the movie many times before I ever read the text.  I must say that I liked the movie far more than I did the text.  There are several reasons why.
The text like so many Stephen King books is too dense with what I consider uneeded information.  King sometimes gets too carried away in his own story and writes pages and pages of tangents that aren’t really needed.  The Shining is no different.  The movie cuts out much of this thick tangential information.  Of course mind you, there is little in way of coherency between the book and movie. The movie only takes in the highlights of the book and leaves out a lot of other information.  But enough about the movie.
The Shining is about a little boy with ESP, a haunted hotel, and a father haunted by his own past and alcoholism. As with most haunted house books, King makes the malevolent hotel attack the most vulnerable first.  It goes after Daddy because of his alcoholism and his checkered, violent past.  He becomes easily swayed by the powers of the Overlook.  Danny is the next to be attack and this is because of his psychic ability.  The hotel and all the evil spirits in it fear Danny because he has the power to stop them from their evil work.  Poor Wendy is just caught up in the game.  The hotel really has little interest in her.
The major problem with The Shining outside of King’s verboseness (which is more reigned in than some of his other texts) is that the characters are unbelievable.  Danny is especially hard to swallow.  The boy isn’t in school yet, but talks and thinks at an adult level of cognition, sometimes.  Other times, he is like a child.  Danny does have very strong ESP, but that would not make him think like an adult.  He oftentimes thinks just like an adult in situations where a child wouldn’t understand what was happening well enough to make much of a thought process period.  This pulled me out of the story more than anything else.  It is what made the story almost impossible for me to finish.
Of all the text that I have read this semester for my study of the haunted in horror literature, The Shining has been my least favorite, replacing The Phantom of the Opera.   The story just doesn’t work.  Danny is too adult to be a four-year-old, and Wendy far too passive.  If a hotel is running it’s own elevator, and my husband was okay with it, and going nuts, I don’t care how much snow is out there; I’d take my chances with the snow.  Eskimos live in snow houses, why couldn’t she and Danny made shelter like that on their way to the town.  Also why did rangers and other check on them when there was no communication at all?  There were too many unanswered questions for me to enjoy this book. 

Ghost stories and haunted house tales are always hard for me to take. They rely on so many tropes, psychic abilities, evils of the past, weak characters haunted (no pun) by their past for me to get into them.  Although, I believe in very little in the way of monsters and other factors horror stories hand their hats on, I have the hardest time suspended disbelief when it comes to ghosts.  A vampire I can swallow; a disembodied spirit gives me heartburn.  Go figure.

March 25, 2010

Math the Evil from Beyond

Why is it that science and math are so feared in the Lovecraftian universe?  Dreams in the Witch House seem to take these fears to the ultimate conclusion.  Math will first drive you mad then kill you by a witch and little rat man.

It is strange that this short story should speak so much to me, but as anyone who knows me will tell you, I hate and fear math.  Gilman, the main character, was not afraid of math.  He was very fascinated with it.  The problem was he lived in the room where an ancient witch did some wonders with math.  This made him a prime candidate to be haunted by her and the devils of calculus. 

This story varies from other Lovecraft tales in that it is written in the third person.  It also seems more contemporary than other tales.  It still uses his tropes of the horrible unknown and the pull of the stars, but the “I am being driven mad by the unseen evils” is gone.  That makes the story more pleasurable to read.  The problem with the story is that it was too long for the payoff.  The story seemed to meander around and not really do anything except to describe how “creepy” things are.   The story could have just as effectively been told in a few pages. 

The story overall is a scary tale about how evil mathematics are.  Stay away from the math it will kill you.  So my advice is, stay away from math.  I tried to tell my mother that many years ago.

 

March 24, 2010

Practical Demonkeeping

What can I say?  I love Christopher Moore.  I think that he is one of the funniest writers that I've ever read. His brand of absurdist fiction brings me great joy.  So is the case with his first published work, Practical Demonkeeping.  The story does a wonderful job of showing how strange little towns can be. 

The best thing about the story is the character of Howard Philips.  He prescribes to the HP Lovecraft view of the world, and even makes his menus in his cafe reflect this.  I never laughed harder than at this little gem. 

The story follows a man who accidently summons a demon into his control.  The man, named Travis, is a good man, but has to deal with this great evil with a liking for Cookie Monster Comic books.  The story also features how the demon, Catch , wants away from Travis.

I can't say again how funny this book is. I laughed out loud several times, which is something I rarely do when reading.  The entire idea is hillarious, but when the characters start to believe the demon is a great Old One or an earth spirit, things just get too much.

Christopher Moore is a must read.

March 17, 2010

Noboby Likes an Albatross or Spawn of Satan

1967 was a time of great upheaval for our country.  Vietnam raged. Civil rights marched around the country.  The youth of the nation was causing change.  A terrifying idea for the old (literally) order.  In 1967, Ira Levin published Rosemary’s Baby. This little bit of horror (a small volume indeed) took this idea and terrified generations with it.

 

Rosemary Woodhouse is a young newlywed, who with her husband move into a very old apartment building haunted by a horrible history of witches, suicides, and cannibals. It is also populated nearly exclusively of old people.  The worst thing is that all the old people are witches who are bent of world domination.

 

As the story unwinds, we find the old people slowly manipulate the young.  This was the desire of the older population at large, to continue to control everything.  To the young reader, they would see this as a horrible thing.  The issue is that Levin hides this storyline well within the Satanic baby birthing. 

 

So why does Rosemary still work today, when until the recent election, the old ruled the world again?  This is because the reader doesn’t really know what is the truth and what isn’t.  The whole story is told from the tight third person POV of Rosemary.  The same character who believes that old people of the apartment are witches.  She is also pregnant at the point that the whole paranoia begins.  Could the whole tale have been pregnancy related psychosis, and of course post partum once she is no longer pregnant?  Did Rosemary simply lose the baby?  Was the baby born but because she was so nutty the others take it from her for her safety?  That is the real horror of Levin’s story.  He successfully pulls off a story that everyone thinks is about the Devil’s child, but a closer reading (and viewing if you watch the film) shows that it really could just be psychosis on Rosemary’s part. 

 

Having worked many years in the field of psychology/psychiatry, I have seen people who have very realistic delusional and hallucinatory beliefs and experiences.  The worst as I so often said, were the delusions that could be real life events.  This is the case with Rosemary.  Her ordeal could be real or a very elaborate delusional mindset.  That truly terrifies me.

 

Levin is a master, if for no other reason than Rosemary’s Baby. This is scary on so many psychological levels and is a wonderful work of psychological horror.

 

March 10, 2010

So that's where Catfish McGee lives.

As I sit here writing this blog entry, it is a dark and stormy morning.  When better to write a Lovecraft blog?

 

I hope that no one is thunderstruck when I say this, but I like “The Shadow Over Innsmouth”.  It may just be my favorite Lovecraft story so far.  There are some reasons why of course.  One is that I fortunately don’t have to go mad from reading it.  It’s always nice when madness doesn’t follow reading a short story.  Also, Innsmouth is like so many creepy little places I’ve been to in my life, sans the fish people.

 

Lovecraft was a giant xenophobe and racist.  I hope that doesn’t shock anyone; it’s all over his writing in case you haven’t noticed.  This story seems to be the ultimate in his xenophobia (fear of strangers or foreigners for those not as familiar with phobias as I). Innsmouth is the ultimate creepy location of strangers. 

 

Lovecraft’s art of brooding mood plays well in this story.  His usual too thick description of putrid horror is just right for this tale.  The people, the houses, the bus are all so well described that you can see them.  You can almost smell the putrid smell of the town (I imagine fishy, like Bayou La Batre, AL in summer).  This whole story for that part reminds me of Bayou La Batre set in New England.  Maybe this is the reason I like it so much. 

 

Anyway, this seems to be the best of Lovecraft’s stories so far.  It’s an enjoyable mixture of his thick over description and xenophobic horror.

 

A plus HP A plus.


Hosting by Yahoo!